Philosophical Oppositions in Sana'i Ghaznavi’s Poetry

Document Type : Scholary

Authors

Department of Persian Language and Literature, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Binary opposition is a key element in structuralism. Structuralists view human thinking as formed on the basis of binary oppositions. Binary opposition is the most significant component to consider in the analysis and investigation of various phenomena. One of the prominent features of binary opposition is that, despite appearing contrary to habit and reason, it provides the audience with a familiar taste and brings enormous enjoyment. This theoretical research has been conducted using the descriptive-analytical method and utilizing library resources. It focuses on Diwan Sana'i (Sana'i’s poems) published by Negah Publishing Co., 1941, and Hadiqat Al Haqiqa (The Walled Garden of Truth) published by the University of Tehran Press, 2007.
Findings and Conclusion: A particularity of philosophical confrontations in Sana'i's poetry is the transcendence of the earthly material world and the confrontation with superior truths. Sana'i has defined many of these philosophical themes, which may seem contrasting, as coexisting. From this perspective, his poetry contains numerous linguistic and philosophical oppositions and contradictions. Among these themes, "Lāhut" (divinity or heavenly world) and "Nāsut" (the earthly world) have the highest frequency, while "Doon" (Low) and "Bālā" (High) have the lowest frequency.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ahmadi, B. (2003), Text Structure and Interpretation. 6th Print, Tehran, Markaz.
Bertens, H. (2005), Literary Theory: The Basics. translated by Mohammad Reza Abolqasemi, Tehran, Mahi.
Bressler, Ch. (2007), Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Translated by Mustafa Abedini Fard, Tehran, Nilufar.
Chandler, D. (2007), Semiotics: The Basics. Translated by Mahdi Parsa, Tehran, Sure Mehr.
Culler, J. (2003), Literary Theory. translated by Farzaneh Taheri, Tehran, Markaz.
Fotuhi, M. (2007), The Rhetoric of the Image. 1st edition, Tehran, Sokhan publications.
Fowler, R. (2002), Linguistic Criticism. translated by Maryam Khozan and Hossein Payandeh, 2nd edition, Tehran, Ney.
Jacobson, R. (2001), The metaphoric and metonymic poles. translated by Kurosh Safavi. In Post-structuralism and Literary Studies, Edited by of Farzan Sojudi, Tehran, Hoze-ye Honary, 115-128.
Martinet, A. (1380), Économie des changements phonétiques. Translated by Hormoz Milanian, Tehran, Hermes.
Obeidiniya, M.A. et al. (2009), «Investigating Binary Oppositions in the Structure of Hadiqa of Sanai». Persian Language and Literature Research Quarterly, No. 13, 25-42.
Okhovat, A. (1992), The Grammar of Story. Isfahan, Farda.
Safavi, K. (2004), An Introduction to Semantics. 2nd edition, Tehran, Sureh Mehr.
Sajjadi, J. (1995), A Dictionary of Mystical Terms and Expressions. 1st edition, Tehran, Tahuri.
Sana'i Ghaznavi, M. (2007), Hadiqat al-Haqiqa and Shariat al-Tariqa. Annotations by Modares Razavi, Tehran, University of Tehran.
Id. (1941), Diwan Sanai. Modares Razavi Print, Tehran, Negah.
Scholes, R. (2000), Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Translated by Farzaneh Taheri, Tehran, Ageh.
Selden, R. (2005), A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Translated by Abbas Mokhber, 3rd edition, Tehran, Tarhe Now.
Shamisa, S. (2009), Literary Criticism. 3rd edition, Tehran, Mitra.
Yahaghi, M.J. (2002), Stream of the Moments. Jami, Tehran.
Yazdanjoo, P. (2008), Postmodern Literature. 2nd edition, Tehran, Markaz.
Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies
Volume 5, Issue 2
Summer & Autumn
July 2023
Pages 257-266

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics